@m2Giles feel free to work from this PR to get this merged into Bluefin.

With the iso justfiles merged, we should be able to iterate this quickly. Will look at this later.

Moving the bootupctl command before the initramfs generation worked.

Note: using testing branch for the better brew install as well. Bootc is waiting on an update to the GitHub action

Probably should of just rebased to before the brew stuff. But it's all removed.

This merge is currently waiting on a pinned release of the container build installer action.

bootc install requires gdisk which is not available in the image,
I tested installing on my machine with tpm2 encryption on, it worked beautifully: sudo podman run --rm --privileged --pid=host -v /var/lib/containers:/var/lib/containers -v /dev:/dev --security-opt label=type:unconfined_t ghcr.io/gallium-stanza/bluefin:40-testing-20240511 /bin/bash -c 'rpm-ostree install gdisk --apply-live && bootc install to-disk /dev/nvme0n1 --wipe --filesystem=btrfs --block-setup=tpm2-luks'

then I rebased to ghcr.io/ublue-os/bluefin:latest and added a recovery key for luks2 partition, just to be on the safe side.

I just realized I've only tested 40 images since we added the bootc.sh.

Need to make sure it doesn't negatively effect 39 images.

Ok so should I add gdisk in a separate PR?

I think that is for the install to disk option of bootc.

Kinda like the coreOS installer command

It looks like 39 doesn't like the bootupctl command at all.

Do we have a slimmed down testing image for things like this (https://github.com/rust-vmm/rust-vmm-container/blob/main/Dockerfile)?) I am literally working on bootc testing because virt-vmm supposedly supports natively connecting to guest VMs, and supports booting directly from images. I guess just the fedora-bootc:41 ... maybe with nvidia because intercepts some things but I was hoping something lightweight. Their repo is like all over the place, I'm guessing this (https://gitlab.com/fedora/bootc/base-images-experimental/-/blob/main/Containerfile?ref_type=heads) but the containerfile is hardcoded to 40? Ignore my virt-vmm is there anything you're using or I'm missing to do some smoke tests?

Thanks! LGTM! And sorry if it seemed like I was nit-picking

Nope. This was weird where I had another branch where I was doing changes as well and some cleanup was missing. This is why we review!